My contribution to the discussion for Week 3 is as follows:
1. What is the experience of women farmers particularly?
Without climate change in the picture, the situation of Malawian women in agriculture is already disadvantaged. Women play a crucial role in agriculture in Malawi, producing 70% of the locally consumed food. However, land rights and rules mean that women hold only one-third of agricultural holdings. More often than not, women’s access to land is through the family head, who is typically a man. Thus although they perform 50–70% of all agricultural tasks, women rarely have control over the land or the yields. Female-managed plots are, on average, 12% smaller than those of their male counterparts and 25% less productive due to differing levels of knowledge and access to inputs for improving farming efficiency.
Other factors that constrain the role of women in agriculture include lesser control over natural resources, lower education levels, reduced labour availability (due to gender roles that govern their role in home care), and minimal access to financial resources. These limit their knowledge of improved production practices, access to farm inputs (including fertilisers and improved seeds) and labour-saving technologies (such as ploughing machinery), and the ability to practice more labour-intensive farming methods.
Do they grow certain crops that experience climate change in a particular way?
Climate change has affected the agricultural sector more than any other sector. Currently, agriculture accounts for about 42% of Malawi’s GDP. Whilst tobacco, tea and sugar are important cash crops, smallholder farmers, most women, produce about 80% of the country’s food (primarily maize).
Ensuring that agriculture is sustainable within the framework of a changing climate requires that farmers are aware of potential weather and climate conditions to factor these into their planning. Various timeframes of information are essential to inform agricultural decisions. Weather forecasts help determine day to day activities, such as when to apply fertiliser. Seasonal forecasts can determine how much farmers can plant and what crop/variety to match anticipated conditions. Understanding the gender differences in farming patterns and practices is critical for effectively targeting climate services.
Do women hold certain jobs in the value chain?
A significant challenge for gender-equitable climate-smart agriculture is the invisibility of women in farming due to the lack of sex-disaggregated data and research into gender differences in current resource use, farming practices and aspirations. A study of 15 sites across West Africa, East Africa and South Asia shows that women have a broader conception of food security beyond production. Interventions that focus solely on production therefore potentially benefit men relative to women. A better understanding of the role of gender in the agricultural sector could illuminate how best to increase production, reduce poverty, improve food security, and transform gender relations towards a situation of equality. Enabling such a shift requires gender sensitivity within the institutions and organisations in Malawi’s agricultural development. Some donor organisations have begun analysing their support to agricultural development to determine the extent of gender sensitivity in approach and highlight any gender differences in outcome. Awareness of the need to train both women as extension workers and integrate gender into the broader curriculum for the agricultural extension has long been recognised in Malawi. However, the Ministry of Agriculture, Irrigation and Water Development faces broader challenges of recruiting sufficient numbers into the extension service, despite incentives for training.
Gender differences need to be considered in the planning and design of agricultural interventions to support production in the context of a changing climate. It is not enough to design a gender-blind intervention and target women participants. Such an intervention may not be appropriate to the different farming practices that result from gender roles and relations in Malawi. As a result, although it may improve production, it will do so in a way that benefits men relatively more than women, thereby reinforcing existing inequalities. Instead, interventions need to be designed based on an understanding of the gender roles and relations and what that means for agriculture - ensuring that technologies, extension and climate services are targeted to the different needs of men and women. Because women farmers have different access to land, often grow different crops and have a broader conception of food security than men, targeting interventions to increase their productivity requires a gender-sensitive approach to what is done and how. Such an approach may involve different types of support for men and women to achieve the desired outcome.
Do women need certain information, and how do they get it?
Awareness of gender differences is essential to identifying and addressing gender differences in vulnerability to climate change. The combination of natural resource dependence and gendered differences in assets and resources means that women are typically more vulnerable than men to climate change. However, the reality is more nuanced. There are differences from place to place, and understanding the gender context is necessary to determine the specific nature of men’s and women’s vulnerabilities. A study in Mulanje (a district in the southern part of Malawi), for example, highlighted differences in women’s vulnerability depending on whether they were part of a male-headed or female-headed household. The same study also showed that place of residence was more correlated with differences in vulnerability than gender. Therefore, understanding the contextual specificities of gendered vulnerability is essential to target gender-equitable agricultural support to adapt to climate change effectively.
Currently, farmers rely on indigenous knowledge and personal experience when deciding what to cultivate and when to plant. According to a recent study, crop farmers in Malawi have defined that useful weather information is forecasts of extreme events, the onset of the rains, seasonal rainfall, daily weather and its linkages to pests and diseases. This information needs to be received on time for farmers to use. The agricultural advice that would be most useful includes information about cropping patterns. The preferred communication channels are visits from extension agents, radio messages and SMS by cell phones. Critically, however, women farmers are significantly less able to use the advice relative to men because most of these channels get to men. This reflects women’s lesser control over agricultural assets and access to land.
Having the correct information to share is one thing. Getting it to the right audience is another. One of the evaluation criteria for agriculture radio programmes that Farm Radio International promotes is to ensure that the radio programme is broadcast when the targeted audience can listen to the radio programme. For instance, women in rural Malawi are very busy with household chores between 11 am and 2 pm. Therefore, it is a waste of airtime to broadcast an agricultural information programme during those hours when most rural women are busy with household chores.