Week Four: Creating a safe learning environment

Hello everyone

I trust you had a lovely weekend, well rested and you are ready to tackle this week’s tasks. Welcome to the final week of our discussion on addressing sensitive issues on air.

Broadcasters play key roles as facilitators in preserving listeners’ integrity, and using radio formats that best appeal to the target audience. Our focus this week is on creating a safe and positive environment for learning.

You are expected to share your on-air experience with listeners’ testimonies on sensitive issues such as gender based violence (GBV).

The following questions will guide you on your contribution this week:

  1. Do you allow people to speak or contribute anonymously?

  2. What techniques do you apply to protect the identity of survivors who do not want to be identified?

  3. According to you, which radio formats best stimulate listener’s participation on topics such as gender based violence, religion, politics and sexual reproductive health?

Submit your contribution using the questions above and comment on other participants’ contributions.

You can use texts and/or voice notes to share your contributions.

Our resource people are here and will clarify issues and answer any questions you might have.

As a reminder, participants who introduced themselves and have been posting regularly at least three meaningful messages per week will receive an 'active participant’ certificate issued by Farm Radio International.

Enjoy your day!

Hello,
Jipson Banda, Nyanthepa Community Radio Station 98.2fm
Based in Nsanje district, Malawi.

Week 4 contribution

  1. Yes we do allow sources to contribute anonymously

  2. So many techniques are applied;
    A. We do hide names, places and names of people related to the sources
    B. The story is told with a different setup, names and places etc.

  3. The best format to stimulate listeners participation on sensitive issues can be round table/panel discussion with opportunity for listeners to call and or text in. an investigative pre-recorded program can somehow be ideal to collect vox poc kind of interviews

1 Like

Hello everyone

I would like to share some contributions from the WhatsApp group.

Oliver Malibisa likoma Community radio:

Good morning

1:GBV issues are indeed one of the sensitive issue.

  • Following our editorial Policy guided by MACRA it allows @ to protect our sources and this gives the Source to freely.

2:As a Community radio,first thing we change the name of survivors, and also we do change the voice when doing editings .

3: To give platform to our listeners mostly we use VOXPOP. ppo mostly feel open to speak .

Hello, Bright Lunda ,Nkhoma Synod Radio:

We allow people on air to speak and contribute anonymously ,yes ,depends on what they see fit

We commonly use fake names if we have an interview from a survivor, thats to protect them

  1. On our radio ,I believe that phone in program formats are the best. The fact that the listeners will hear themselves on radio gives them energy to contribute. And another one is a magazine program especially for the youths, young people feel free to talk amongst themselves in a round table manner

This is Precious from Uganda Community Green Radio Kiboga:

  1. Yes. Anonymity is always granted when someone doesn’t want to be disclosed for some reasons. But in publication, we always explain why the source requested anonymity and we are always sure that the information given by anonymous source is factual. In some instances, additional sources are needed let’s say from an authoritative figure who provides information on record so that there is no question of accuracy
  2. Withholding the names, changing the names, editing the recorded voice, not mentioning the residence
  3. Voxpop, human interest stories that create emotional connection

Emmanuel Gameli Dovia:

  1. Yes, but for me I allow them to make their contribution short and concise not to insult or provoke anyone.

  2. As part of our policy, you are not allowed to copy any victims voice out without permission from programs manager, more so we even trunket the voice in case we want to replay.

  3. To give platform to our listeners to send WhatsApp messenger for your smartphone or tablet and VOX POP.

Greetings. My name is Dorica Banda Nanguna from ZNBC Radio in Zambia. My approach to talk shows or phone in programs is to make the listeners own the show by way of active participation via phone calls, WhatsApp texts and voicevnotes. With an expert on hand in the studio, he/she sets the tone for the topic at hand so that the listeners appreciate the topic and the angle taken. Anonymity is allowed and if they need help, I ask them to send their details via the WhatsApp line provided for the program. The one seeking anonymity is referred to as X throughout the program and an explanation is given as to why the participant seeks that status.
In my opinion, phone in programs best stimulate the listeners’ participation because as humans, we develop empathy towards survivors and are moved to call in and offer advice or sympathy. Other survivors relate to the story a survivor tells and are compelled to phone in and also share their story or ask for help.

Longok Mathew Abekson, Ateker FM, Moroto Uganda: 1. Making respondents better informed of the use of data (i.e., who is the audience for the story/discussion results and how will the discussion results be disseminated), and 2) by instituting practical steps to facilitate dialogue with respondents about how their data can be used (i.e., revising the informed yes process). I discuss these two dimensions of the alternative approach, followed by a discussion of internal review boards at our radio station.

Hello I’m Susan Mariam Nakaseke radio, Uganda. Yes listener are allowed to contribute briefly on different topics, we could use different names except the survivor’s name to protect their identity , call in format can help the listeners tackle different topics , thanks

Good morning :sunrise_over_mountains: everyone, I’m Elias Yen Nabire from Ghana with GBC URA Radio.
1.As a presenter, it’s always a joy and gratifying during and after your program when you had a lot of calls or text messages from your audience. it’s a moment of joy beyond measure & it’s also proved how satisfactory the program was. A well design program has an aim and one of our goals as presenters is to satisfy our audience. I allow my audience who don’t want to be identified to contribute especially on sensitive issues. But as the presenter you may know who is he/she before his/ her voice put on Air.
2. To protect identity of survivors who don’t want to be identified, you change their names if it’s an interview or you inform listeners, your guest want to be remain unknown, provided it’s not a threat to security.
3. radio magazine & phone in.

Sakina Majawa Chancellor College Radio: It is possible to detailea of someone contributing ING on a live program separately to hide his/ her ID. But also how sure are we of the Identity, to avoid complicating one another. I would like to learn from you Elias

Benjamin Kaneka: Good morning colleagues. My name once again is Benjamin Kaneka a training specialist from Malawi. The ideas are very critical and forward looking. When dealing with sensitive issues such as SGBV or worse still intimate partner violence please ensure that the information is not exagarrated just to fit into the narrative. Make sure that only facts are used in the program.

Joshua Kakooza : Yes indeed but it was also discussed that where it requires some elongated call-ins it’s better we engage experts as well to guide the show

Elias Yen Nabire: You have a point but this applied to all phone in calls . The caller can mention any name to you as his / her name and you have nothing to do. So to identifying a caller unless you use the true caller app.

Egigogo Maimuna : The only way u can use caller app is when your station uses landline because numbers would be seen or displayed on it and if it is the modern phone that is hybrid phone callers identify is not seen

Esther Nasara : Good morning great house members and Farm Radio hope everyone is doing fine?
I work with Plateau Radio Television Corporation Jo’s Plateau State. And my programme on TV known as the Baroness does not allow participants to contribute anonymously. 1.Rather they call and introduce themselves as well as where their locations before speaking out their contributions.
2. Because the programme is operating on the concept and ethics of social work confidentially of victims is utmost for us. We rather use Organizations defending such victims like Federation of Female lawyers and human rights to guide us legally so we donot cross our boundaries.
3. For my programme vox pop stimulates better and sensitive topics on health such as IVF, human rights and because of their sensitivity we ensure their confidentiality.

Iqra Adani ,community radio station,from Mangochi ( Malawi) .

Yes it allowed were by we always protect sources that help to work no fear.

We don’t mention names we use privacy names.

We always allow whole entire community members to speak freely about GVB and other sensitive issues

Dickson Kambalame for Maziko Radio Station in Malawi. we allow people to contribute anonymously as their right to do so as well as protecting the survivors.

Another means is mentioning not real names and thier voice should should not be identified if they are not will to do so in the way of protecting their identities.

On formats a magazine and phone calls are mostly used.

Good afternoon once again in the House, this is Longok Mathew Abekson from Ateker FM Uganda. 1. Yes we do but given the fact that media is always best delivery by being evidence oriented, we are only in the time of threats I.e in the region where our radio is we have had cattle rustling for close to 2years now and here elites are in most cases either threatened or killed by thugs and to broadcast sighting openly the source of a leak will need authorities like Police verification and a go ahead guaranteed. So we so my point is we do give listeners to contribute anonymously depending on the discussion target.

Ngwenya Denis: Good afternoon all. We do allow people to contribute anonymously especially if the matter is sensitive to endanger the life of the person. We use the fake names for the interviewees in order to protect them.

Philmon Layson Kuipa : Will I be right to say that this is only possible where the victim is indeed the victim? I am saying this because some fake be victims when they actually perpetrators or they have personal agenda to advance (with malice intentions).

Oluwabunmi Stephen Fajonyomi Voice of Nigeria: Good afternoon all. As a government funded broadcast house, we rarely do live programmes or phone in programmes so we can vet whatever information that is broadcast.

Good afternoon everyone, I remain Safiya Saleh Ibrahim.

1-Yes, because listeners positive contributions add value to the program, especially phone in programs, from there you will know the acceptability of your program.

2- Like in my station, I produce feminine program that protects the right of girl child/women, in which we have Legal practitioners that stands for that girl/woman when the need arises. Since it is Radio station, we use to edit the victim’s voice, and not to mention name or location, and when interview, we try as much as we can not to mention things that will make people to know who the victim is, because of her reputation.

3-Phone in/ interview

Good afternoon everyone, I am saffie kamara from sierra Leone working for shalom Radio

  1. Yes, doing your program without the contribution from the listeners it means the people are not in favor of your program, for us at shalom Radio any time we are presenting sensitive issues we are opening phone line some time we only open it for text message, evening if someone insult the panelist the presenter/ moderator can solve the issue, because if I didn’t read that isulting text message.
    Also by allowing the listeners to make there own contribution that can help you the presenter to put more effort on that particular program.

  2. Is this area if the survivor doesn’t want for him/her to be identified, the only technique I will do is by changing the voice and name of the survivor during the editing process if the information that he/she is giving correct, and also I can do all this if he/she told me to hide his identity.

3.Like for our own radio station, shalom Radio we usually discussed these main three topics, Gender Based Violence, Politics and Sexual Reproductive health, during the discussion of the GBV our listeners are participating very well expecially the women that is the time they will tell us what they are going through in there different homes, the pain they are feeling with so many things we dont know, that is the time we will know most of the violence women and some men are going through.

Also POLITICS we have so many people that are participating during the discussion, expecially the youth, because they are the ones politician normal dump time for election, also community people are calling to say there mind what some of the politician have lie to them.

Under the SEXUAL REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH discussion we also have people that are participating expecially when we have an expert that knows his/her job well, you will hear people are calling or sending text message towards the topic, some are giving advice to the younger ones and some will give there views what they about this topic.

Maybin August Katungulu : It is great we are the 4th week and looking forward to finishing this discussion.

  1. We people choose to withhold the names when making a contribution on RADIO, I personally respect their rights
  2. Sometimes I mapher the audio to protect survivors who prefer not to be identified.
    3.i believe phone in programme coupled with vox pos stimulates listener’s participation

Emmanuel Alonkunaab : It depends on the issues one is discussing on if the the person is a victim of such issue and wants to share his/her experience I can allow the person but if only the person just wants to contribute to the program no I will not allow that it may bring complications.
(2) One can introduce a program without mentioning the interviewee’s name and another way is to change the voice if possible
(3) First voxpop after that engage experience and expect

Busi Ngcebetsha:

It seems the formats of choice are vox pops and call ins. We must remember that vox pops are just clips with opinions of people, it is not a format one can use to get the story from the concerned party.

We must also remember, we want to share a story so that people may learn from it. At the same time we want to ensure the safety of the person sharing the experience - that is what we mean by the safe learning environment.

I believe we can be more creative than just settling for vox pops and call ins.

Think of other formats you may use to pass the message while protecting the identity of the survivor.

Good evening once again. This is Fidelis Awonodomo Da-uri from Amplio Ghana.

We call our audience feedback as user feedback. Users of our Talking Book audio technology are able to record their feedback about the program, community or social issues that need to be addressed. Users can record their feedback anonymously without mentioning their names. Also, as part of protecting our users privacy, there is a way of blocking sensitive user feedback that no other user will have access to unless the program team is processing and analyzing feedback from users.

As I said in week one, we mostly use dramas for topics such as gender-based violence and expert interviews to discuss issues like sexual reproductive health.

Thank you

Oliver Kandela Bulaya: Yes I allow people to contribute anonymously for their own reason my role is to ensure that their contributions is within the confinement of the law or broadcasting procedure.

Survivors WHO do not want to be identified may not use actual names or give information that may identify them to the audience. Ethical consideration is imperative in order to protect them.

RADIO discussions with experts and phone in calls gives such a mixed grill information where listeners may pick one or two important information they can appy in theue context

Good evening esteemed.
My name is Niyi Dahunsi, Radio Nigeria Ibadan.
It is very pertinent to ensure not just our own safety as broadcasters, but also the safety of our listener and contributors to program, especially in issues connected to Gender Based Violence GBV.

I do allow people to contribute anonymously if that makes them comfortable. Sometimes it takes time for victims to even trust the presenter’s level of maturity. Moreover, they may feel embarrassed if known or that the ‘criminal’ may still come after them. Don’t forget that those who inflict violence or injury on them are usually close people like husband, wife, parent, uncle, aunt, carer, teacher, etc.

So, the survivor, who doesn’t want to be identified can write the story for another person to read.
(S)He can speak, while I superimpose another person’s voice.
Some may prefer to speak but refuse to mention their names.

Its ok to use discussion where opportunity can be given to bare your mind in company of other views. Its ok to argue to get different mind sets.
Interactive is also good, phone-in can be accommodated, people can contribute on social handles. Delayed contribution can allow for editing to prevent explicit contents.

Jipson Banda, Nyanthepa Community Radio Station 98.2fm, Based in Nsanje district, Malawi.

Week 4 contribution

  1. Yes we do allow sources to contribute anonymously

  2. So many techniques are applied;
    :anchor:We do hide names, places and names of people related to the sources
    :anchor:The story is told with a different setup, names and places etc.

  3. The best format to stimulate listeners participation on sensitive issues can be round table/panel discussion with opportunity for listeners to call and or text in. an investigative pre-recorded program can somehow be ideal to collect vox poc kind of interviews

Charles Kikoricho : If a clear for this a think poem, drama is a good way of formart to get story but also message

Hello, Grace Mafuta , Umoyo community Radio , Mangochi Malawi:
Yes we realy allow sources to controbute anonymously.
We avoid to mention names even placas of the related sources, this helps our listeners participation on sensitive issues .
To add on this , poems, drama and songs can also help good way of format to have good story and information.

Patel Chris_Rugure: Good afternoon everyone.

1.Yes i do allow people to contribute anonymously because some of them will be victims of GBV so they will be very scared to talk about their situations thinking of what will happen when my spouse hear my name on air talking about home issues they will definately beat them again or do something worse than that.

2.With the new technology that keep on changing in this morden world if the caller chooses to be anonymous lets say when we interviewing them on air ,me and my team we use a voice changer effect so that they sound different and no one could hear them at all.

As for me i think if some of these issues of GBV we can do them in a drama way…just vocal drama and at the end we ask the listeners to call and tell us what they learnt,i think that way the participation of people will be very high .We can as well do poetry on air or music that wont be so direct but yet the messege is being delivered to the individuals listening. ( Malawi) .

Yes it allowed were by we always protect sources that help to work no fear.

We don’t mention names we use privacy names.

We always allow whole entire community members to speak freely about GVB and other sensitive issues

The discussion continues…

Fredrick Silwimba , Nyanthepa from Radio Chimwemwe , Ndola Zambia
.
week 4

Yes we do allow sources to contribute anonymously for many reasons
we use many tectonics voice pops, voice effects , whats app messages so that they cannot be recognized , or even hiding names, places of people related to the sources
.
Discussion through round table is the best ideal because it gives opportunity for listeners to participate some via calls or text contributing without delays there and then. .
pre-recorded program can also be good in some in instances where you have collected the voice pops
Thank you.

1 Like

Hello @fredrick1

Thank you for sharing. I understand using voice effects can help change the voice of someone so that people cannot recognise it, that is good. Now you are also talking about round table discussion, meaning you have everyone you want to interview in one space, that probably includes the same person you want to protect. We know our communities, or at least where I come from, the community can easily visit the station to see what they are hearing anytime. In one station, during a dedications programs, some listeners just pop in at the studio to say their dedications instead of calling in or sending a text message.

How can you ensure the safety of this person then, let’s say this person is sharing an experience of gender based violence?

Hello everyone

We have come to the end of our discussion and those that qualified for certificates will receive them by the end of the week.

Please complete the feedback survey, here is the link https://forms.gle/KzeJTXgteoqRnmsH8

In Week 4, we looked at whether you allow people to contribute anonymously, what techniques you use to create a safe learning environment and what formats you use to best stimulate listener participation on sensitive issues programs.

A lot of issues came up including examples of sensitive issues people worked on and experienced difficulties, others to a point of being taken in by police for broadcasting such issues.

Coming to the topics at hand, see below:

1- Do you allow people to speak or contribute anonymously?

Everyone responded YES to this question and reasons range from editorial policies, exercising human rights, respecting privacy. This also makes the sources free to share experiences and valuable information. Media needs to be a voice for the voiceless so allowing people to contribute anonymously and listeners’ positive contributions add value to the program.

  • It depends on the issues one is discussing. If the person is a victim of such an issue and wants to share his/her experience I can allow the person to contribute anonymously but if the person just wants to contribute to the program no I will not allow that as it may bring complications.

  • Users of our Talking Book audio technology are able to record their feedback about the program, community or social issues that need to be addressed. Users can record their feedback anonymously without mentioning their names. Also, as part of protecting our users’ privacy, there is a way of blocking sensitive user feedback that no other user will have access to unless the program team is processing and analyzing feedback from users.

  • Sometimes it takes time for victims to even trust the presenter’s level of maturity. Moreover, they may feel embarrassed if known or that the ‘criminal’ may still come after them. Don’t forget that those who inflict violence or injury on them are usually close people like husband, wife, parent, uncle, aunt, carer, teacher, etc.

  • If it is a survivor of SGBV we need to have a survivor centred approach in the sense that whatever we do should be in the best interests of the survivor. Another element is that there should be a rights based approach in which the rights of the survivor are upheld. At the end of the day the survivor should come out better than before the program.

There are instances where anonymity may not be ideal:

  • When the caller is a threat to security and society

  • My programme on TV known as the Baroness does not allow participants to contribute anonymously. Rather they call and introduce themselves as well as their locations before speaking out their contributions.

  • As a producer allowing a discussant to speak anonymously in a radio program for whatever reason is not the best, as a government station you can always be traced through the producer or the station. In a situation of GBV. I believe the discussants must be responsible enough to be able to choose their words and work according to the rules and regulations of the producer via the script of the moderator of the program.

I would like to highlight that issues of confidentiality and anonymity are ethical (moral) issues. When you do not keep somebody’s confidentiality or anonymity, in itself, it rarely becomes a criminal or civil cause attracting the intervention of the courts.

But let’s assume it has reached the gates of the courts, the complainant would need to prove that you (the defendant) indeed promised to keep the complainant’s confidentiality. If it becomes purely the complainant’s word against the defendant’s, the case might not succeed in a court of law.

Going forward, probably we should consider using consent forms to back up our actions under such circumstances.

2- What techniques do you apply to protect the identity of survivors who do not want to be identified?

Most people said they use effects to change the voice of the survivor. Some also use a different name but may announce that the information provided is factual but for safety and privacy they cannot disclose the actual name of the person.The station policy also plays a big part here as disclosing one’s identity without permission may put the radio station and presenter in trouble.

  • The caller can mention any name to you as his / her name and you have nothing to do with identifying a caller unless you use the true caller app.

  • I produce feminine program that protects the rights of girl children or women, in which we have legal practitioners that stand for that girl/woman when the need arises. Since it is a radio station, we edit the victim’s voice, and not to mention name or location, and when interviewing, we try as much as we can not to mention things that will make people know who the victim is, because of her reputation.

  • Recognise the suffering of the individual, listen very carefully and record the conversation with the consent of the individual and don’t be a judge. Uphold trust, integrity and don’t discuss it with friends or family members. When you want to air a testimony, a trustworthy person should voice the testimony. Don’t describe the area etc

3- According to you, which radio formats best stimulate listener’s participation on topics such as gender based violence, religion, politics and sexual reproductive health?

  • Vox pops,

  • Phone-in programs best stimulate listeners’ participation, listeners like to hear themselves on radio and this gives them more energy to contribute. As humans, we develop empathy towards survivors and are moved to call in and offer advice or sympathy. Other survivors relate to the story a survivor tells and are compelled to phone in and also share their story or ask for help. As a presenter, it’s always a joy and gratification when you have a lot of calls or text messages from your audience. Contribution from the listeners means the people are not in favor of your program. Under the SEXUAL REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH discussion we also have people that are participating especially when we have an expert that knows his/her story well, you will hear people are calling or sending text message towards the topic, some are giving advice to the younger ones and some will give their views on the topic.

  • A magazine program especially for the youths, young people feel free to talk amongst themselves in a round table manner

  • Pre-recorded interview clips

  • Round table discussion, during the discussion of the GBV our listeners are participating very well especially women, that is the time they will tell us what they are going through in their different homes, the pain they are feeling with so many things we don’t know, that is the time we will know most of the violence women and some men are going through.

  • We mostly use drama for topics such as gender-based violence and expert interviews to discuss issues like sexual reproductive health. With drama and at the end we ask the listeners to call and tell us what they learnt,I think that way the participation of people will be very high. Drama is very good when it comes to advocacy of GBV , FGM and many more of these kind of issues. At my station, Widows & Orphans Moment (WOM), a local NGO, has a series of dramas on GBV and anytime we play one episode, the contribution from the audience is always awesome.

  • RADIO discussions with experts and phone in calls gives such a mixed grill information where listeners may pick one or two important pieces of information they can apply in their context.

  • The best format to stimulate listeners participation on sensitive issues can be round table/panel discussion with opportunity for listeners to call and or text in. an investigative pre-recorded program can somehow be ideal to collect vox pop kind of interviews

  • Poetry, music that won’t be so direct but yet the message is being delivered to the individuals listening. Yes but still it depends on the music content and character building up for example we have had songs condemning related acts and containing solutions. If it’s the songs you put in the drama, you put songs that are original or from the respective cultures of the people you aim to educate, because in our society there are people who compose songs entirely in order to inspire various things such as agriculture, women to participate in leadership and many others. Looking at the demerit while your thoughts are on merit, the major problem is that so many people are copying bad attitudes by watching a drama or listening to music. I think what is important is the message being sent. If you are creating a drama about rape, surely the ending should reflect consequences - how it affects the woman and what will happen to the perpetrators otherwise people will not learn from it.

  • A few years ago I headed a regional project called Women in Post conflict Situations: Sharing stories that lead to change covering Rwanda, Burundi, and Eastern DRC. Before implementation, we conducted a study to find out from listeners whether they would like us to deliver the information /messages through drama or if we should feature actual survivors (and why). The finding was that the majority preferred to hear from the survivors themselves. The reason being that the real emotions accompanying the tale would have a greater impact on the listeners to stimulate positive change than any other method such as drama or song. So, probably carrying out some audience research to know their preferences might be helpful. During the same study, we also found that in Rwanda, listeners preferred to receive support and advice on GBV issues from police while in Eastern DRC they trusted religious leaders more. Based on these findings, we implemented the radio programmes accordingly.

  • In one radio station I worked for, I was responsible for a political program. One of the demands was that the country needed to open the airwaves for people of all political leanings. Live phone-ins were some of the activities to be introduced. And this was with the background that when such experiments were done before, some callers would come on air and speak ill of political and government leaders. The experiments were stopped and MBC leadership were hesitant to bring it back. As the adage goes that one cannot stop a change whose hour has come, live phone-ins were reintroduced. During the early days and weeks, many callers continued the trend of abusing leaders of the ruling party. The station did not disconnect them. With time, callers started becoming constructive. Even more interesting, some callers became advisers of fellow callers asking them to be constructive and be ready to offer alternatives to those who are in leadership instead of simply pointing out faults. Lessons could be that: 1. Give people an opportunity to empty their minds - the sooner the better because the trend is that with sensitive issues, it normally always gets worse before it gets better.

    2. It's more healthy for a country/community when people have opportunities to vent out whatever is building up in their minds because stakeholders can have an opportunity to deal with the issues. Keeping them inside for longer might turn explosive at some point.
    
  • A radio campaign against GBV is also useful through spots and dramas

  • Documentaries

As you can notice a lot of different formats were suggested. It all depends on the community being served and doing research is important.

Thank you all for your participation.

Cheers

I am Mfaume Pastory, I represent Kings Fm Radio Njombe, Tanzania, direct myself directly to answer the basic questions in our discussion.

Yes, I have grown up refusing to talk to people without introducing me where there is a need to do so depending on the issue being discussed and how important it is to do so.

The method I use to protect my sources that do not need to be identified has been to use informal names not their real names and even change the identity of the voice by translating the announcer and changing the sensitivity of the voice.

I see that commercial radios are the ones that have been stimulating the participation of the listeners because they are among the radios that have grown more competitive and more creative in their presentation and even their announcers have grown to be more competitive. Then social radio has grown with that ability too. Magazine programme and special programes (Features for 30 minutes ) are the best

Thank you

Hello
This Rashid Muzungyo from Kapchorwa Trinity Radio based in Kapchorwa District in Eastern Uganda.
Week 4 contribution

  1. We don’t allow sources to contribute anonymously due to legal implications.We recommend that they contribute and their identities are witheld for security implications.
  2. We do with old. Identities of survivors who request to remain anonymous and for those who do not put forward their request but upon our knowledge and understanding of the potential risk to their lives, we move forward to conceal their identities.
  3. The best radio formats that stimulate listeners include running of promos, phone in interviews, Drama, magazines, Beep to vote,/ Beep for voice messages, using message songs, jingles and DJ mentions among others.
    Thank you.